Maryland Casualty Co. v. Shafer
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Middlecoff, Scott & Ham, Farnsworth, McClure & Burke, Lewis H. Smith, W. N. Gilliam, J. A. Chase, Marley Fisher, Perry F. Backus, Russell & Heid, W. 0. Tyler, Scarborough & Bowen, Blakeley Hughes and W. C. Hamilton for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The county of Tulare and the defendant M. T. Shafer, on the 9th of February, 1918, entered into a contract by the terms of which Shafer agreed to construct a concrete highway for the county. Shafer completed the construction of the highway and the same was accepted by the county January 28, 1919. He failed, however, to pay many persons for labor, material, supplies, team hire, and rental of equipment employed, furnished, and used in the construction of the work. He also made assignments to various persons of sums due or to become due under the contract, and which remain unpaid. The plaintiff,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Wasco Co. v. New England Equitable Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Columbia Digger Co. v. RectorDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1914
- W. P. Fuller & Co. v. Alturas School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Webb v. Crane Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1938
- California Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. OAK GROVE UNION SCH. DIST. OF SONOMA CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Street v. Pacific Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Castro v. MalcolmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.