Davenport v. Sparkman
Texas Commission of Appeals
Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Seventh Supreme Judicial District. Action by B. H. Davenport against W. G. Sparkman and another. Judgment for plaintiff against defendant named reversed by Court of Civil Appeals, 160 S. W. 410, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtS Onfield, P. J.
On the 12th day of August, 1911, B. H. Davenport and W. G. Sparkman entered into a contract wherein Davenport, as independent executor of the estate of M. W. Davenport deceased, agreed to sell and convey to W. G. 'Sparkman, sections numbered 49 and 50 in block No. 10, H. & G. N. R. Co. survey, Collingsworth county for the agreed consideration of §519,200, $4,000 cash payable on the 1st day of January, 1912, the balance of the purchase money to be evidenced by eight vendor’s lien notes, each in the sum of $1,900, due and payable as provided in the contract. The parts of the contract material…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hollifield v. LandrumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Lieber v. NicholsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1918
- Moot v. . Business Men's Investment Assn.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Curtis v. AspinwallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Hughes v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Spencer v. MaverickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Bourland v. HuffhinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Long v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Bourland v. HuffhinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.