Legal Opinion
Paul Kordenbrock v. Gene Scroggy, Warden, Kentucky State Penitentiary
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 3, 1989No. 88-5467, 89-5107PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Paul Kordenbrock appeals the District Court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant claims that his conviction for intentional murder, for which he received the death penalty, and attempted murder were obtained in violation of his federal constitutional rights.1 He raises nine issues on appeal. We agree with the District Court that the introduction of his confession — taken in violation of his Miranda rights — was harmless error, and that the other alleged errors did not violate his constitutional rights.2
On Friday, January 4, 1980 at…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Paul Kordenbrock v. Gene Scroggy, Warden, Kentucky State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- State v. ReevesNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- McWilliams v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Willie Clisby, Cross-Appellant v. Charlie Jones, Warden, Holman Unit, Alabama Department of Corrections, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.