Legal Opinion
Miller v. Galveston/Houston Diocese
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Decided December 13, 1995No. 07-95-0051-CVPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Justice.
Carl Miller (Miller) appealed from a final summary judgment denying him recovery. Originally suing the Diocese of ' Galveston/Houston and Anthony M. Durso (collectively referred to as the Diocese) upon claims of breached contract, wrongful discharge, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, he abandoned, on appeal, the first two causes, and, in one point of error, attacked the court’s dismissal of his claim for infliction of distress. In particular, he contended that material issues of fact existed regarding the elements of outrageous conduct and severe distress. We…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Wornick Co. v. CasasTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Beverly J. Dean, Cross-Appellant v. Ford Motor Credit Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Diamond Shamrock Refining & Marketing Co. v. MendezTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Horton v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- GTE Southwest, Inc. v. BruceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Franklin v. Enserch, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
- Lee Lewis Construction, Inc. v. Harrison, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
- Martinez v. IBP, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
- Dalrymple v. University of Texas System, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.