Legal Opinion

Gayler v. North American Van Lines

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1991No. 93A02-9001-EX-38PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHEZEM, Judge.

Case Summary

Plaintiff/Appellant, Waneta Gayler (Employee), appeals the Full Worker’s Compensation Board’s (Board) decision that injuries to her did not “arise out of” her employment with Defendant/Appellee, North American Van Lines (Employer). We affirm.

Issue

Whether the Board erred in finding that Employee’s injuries did not arise out of her employment with Employer.

Facts

On January 16, 1985, Employee, a semi-tractor trailer driver, was injured in an accident involving her semi, arising out of and in the course of her employment with Employer. There is no dispute that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fields v. Cummins Employees Federal Credit UnionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Litzelswope v. MitchellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Pepinsky v. Monroe County CouncilIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Smith v. National Liquors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Sears Roebuck & Co. v. MurphyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Indiana Farm Bureau Cooperative Ass'n v. EnnisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Kehr Mid-West Iron v. BordnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Straub v. City of ScottsbluffNebraska Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API