Legal Opinion

Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Murphy

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 1987No. 93A02-8612-EX-442PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Judge.

Sears appeals Murphy's workmen's compensation award, raising four issues for our review:

1. Whether Murphy's injury arose "out of" his employment.

2. Whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain a permanent partial impairment award.

8. Whether the permanent partial impairment award is contrary to law.

4. Whether the Industrial Board erred in ordering Sears to reimburse a non-party group insurance carrier.

We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Michael Murphy is employed as a service technician at Sears. His duties include service work on air conditioners, refrigerators, furnaces,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Evans v. Yankeetown Dock Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. United Paperboard Co. v. LewisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Rensing v. Indiana State University Board of TrusteesIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Blaw-Knox Foundry & Mill MacHinery, Inc. v. DacusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Inland Steel Co. v. AlmodovarIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. K-Mart Corp. v. NovakIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Eastham v. Whirlpool Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Houchins v. Kittle's Home FurnishingsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Sears Roebuck & Co. v. MurphyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Associated Ins. Companies, Inc. v. BurnsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API