Legal Opinion

Welborn v. Wallace

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 6, 2000No. 94949PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARL B. JONES, P.J.:

{1 Appellant, Welborn, appeals an order dismissing his Amended Petition. Appellant's action was against his previous attorney, Ron Wallace, and sought a return of money paid to Wallace as a retainer fee to defend him in a eriminal matter. Appellant fired Wallace and requested a refund of the unused retainer fee. According to Appellant, Wallace refused to return any of the retainer fee because it was "nonrefundable". At the time this action was brought, Appellant was incarcerated in the United States federal prison at El Reno,

$2 Wallace's Motion to Dismiss for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Byers v. Sun Savings BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Blair v. McQuarySupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mehdipour v. WiseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. Dopp v. Oklahoma Local BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. Harmon v. DAMETCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API