Legal Opinion

Byers v. Sun Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1914No. 3122PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error from District Court, Kiowa County; James R. Tolbert, Judge. Action by the Sun Savings Bank against Andrew N. Byers on a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HARRISON, C.

This was an action upon a promissory note for $1,000 and interest as provided in the note and to foreclose a mortgage given on certain town lots in the town of Gotebo, Okla., to secure the payment of same. The note and mortgage in question had been executed by the defendant, Byers, while under sentence and confinement in the penitentiary for a felony. It was executed to one G. C. Sheffler, an attorney, as a fee for obtaining a parole. The contract was entered into and executed and the parole obtained afterwards. After Byers was paroled, he further ratified the contract…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Avery v. . EverettNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Guarantee Co. of North America v. First National Bank of LynchburgSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
  3. In re Estate NeracCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Davis v. LaningTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Gray v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. John Doe v. William H. Webster, Director, FbiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  2. Vedin v. McConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  3. Miller v. TurnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Grooms v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Holmes v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API