Legal Opinion

S.H. v. Stickrath

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided May 22, 2008No. 2:04-cv-1206PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on the Ohio Civil Service Employees Association’s (OCSEA) Motion to Intervene. Plaintiffs brought a class action on behalf of all juvenile detainees incarcerated at Ohio Department of Youth Services (“ODYS”) facilities, alleging a myriad of unconstitutional conditions. OCSEA, a labor union representing over 1,000 ODYS employees, moves to intervene pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a) and (b). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES this motion.

II. BACKGROUND

This litigation…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Scotty Grubbs, the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Proposed Intervenor/appellant v. Stephen H. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  2. Timothy Jansen, Cross-Appellants v. City of Cincinnati v. Tilford Youngblood, Prospective Intervenors, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. Grutter v. BollingerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. Kathy Stupak-Thrall,plaintiffs-Appellees v. Daniel Glickman,defendants, the Wilderness Society, Proposed Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Franklin County Law Enforcement Ass'n v. Fraternal Order of Police, Capital City Lodge No. 9Ohio Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API