United States v. City of Detroit
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1DissentClay, Circuit Judge
I agree that the district court abused its discretion, and accordingly, I would reverse, but because I disagree with the majority’s analysis and its instructions to the district court, I do not join the majority opinion. The district court’s decision, though flawed, was limited to the threshold issue of the timeliness of the Unions’ intervention. In contrast, the majority’s decision strays far afield from the decision on appeal and instructs the district court as to how to conduct its proceedings with respect to the underlying issues, even though issues pertaining to “limited intervention”…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stringfellow v. Concerned Neighbors in ActionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.