Legal Opinion
State v. Brant
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 28, 1989No. C6-88-1171PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
This is an appeal from a burglary conviction. The trial court allowed appellant Kevin Lee Brant’s confession to be .entered into evidence and refused to grant additional jail credit. We affirm as modified.
FACTS
Brant was convicted on March 9, 1988 of burglary in the second and third degree following a jury trial in Meeker County.
On September 13, 1986, an engineer on a freight train proceeding through Grove City noticed two men apparently attempting to pry open the door to a liquor store. The police were alerted, along with other train employees. By the time the remainder of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- State v. HardimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Matter of Welfare of M.D.S.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. AzzoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Welfare of C.M.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. HEIGESCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re CMACourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. HEIGESCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010