Legal Opinion

Cherrington v. Cherrington

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 9, 1989PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, J.

In reviewing the former husband’s (husband’s) appeal from a modification judgment ordered by a judge in the Probate and Family Court, we decide that the former wife’s (wife’s) initial request for alimony, filed after the entry of the divorce judgment, should have been brought under, and treated as a request pursuant to, G. L. c. 208, § 34 (1986 ed.); that she did not have the burden of demonstrating a change in circumstances; and that the record does not show that the judge considered all of the statutory factors. We remand the matter for a new hearing.

1. Background. The parties were married…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. First Pennsylvania Mortgage Trust v. Dorchester Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Rice v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Bianco v. BiancoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Ross v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Redding v. ReddingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Banker v. BankerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Pierce v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. Buckley v. BuckleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  4. Hennessey v. SarkisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  5. Woodside v. WoodsideMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API