Hennessey v. Sarkis
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtCohen, J.
The parties’ April 1, 1998, divorce judgment.left two aspects of the division of their marital property to be effectuated in the future. Paragraph eighteen referred the parties to a special master who was charged with implementing an equal division of designated personal property, with the assistance of expert appraisers as needed. Paragraph eight *153provided that the parties divide their stock options equally, with the wife having the right to direct the husband to exercise any options that could not be signed over to her.
While these matters remained pending, the wife moved for a restraining…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AlphasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Frizado v. FrizadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Champagne v. ChampagneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Vaccaro v. VaccaroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Springfield Redevelopment Authority v. GarciaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cooper v. CooperMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Cox v. CoxMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Colorio v. MarxMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Braun v. BraunMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Theresia Renee Breen f/k/a Theresia Renee Black v. Jamie Lee BlackWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.