Legal Opinion

Willard v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1890No. 20573PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Application for a writ of mandate to the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County, The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

The question involved in this application for a writ of mandate is, whether a person held for trial on a charge of felony has the right to have the process of the court to compel the attendance in his behalf of witnesses who are confined as prisoners in the state prison. Title 13 of the Penal Code, which is entitled, “ Proceedings for bringing prisoners imprisoned in the state prison, or the jail of another county, *457before a court,” provides that “ when it is necessary to have a person imprisoned in the state prison brought before any court, .... an order for that purpose may be made by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. HurtadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. WillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. State v. StottNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. PutmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. People v. DavenportCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. In re TramnerNevada Supreme Court · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API