Legal Opinion

State v. Stott

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1993No. S-92-915PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Pursuant to verdict, the defendant-appellant, Shannon Stott, was adjudged guilty of attempting to distribute a controlled substance, marijuana, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-201 (Reissue 1989), Neb Rev. Stat. § 28-405(c)(10) [Schedule I] (Cum. Supp. 1990), and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-416 (Cum. Supp. 1992); distributing the substance, in violation of § 28-416; and conspiring to deliver the substance, in violation of § 28-416 and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-202 (Reissue 1989). Stott asserts, in summary, that the district court erred in (1) failing to suppress certain evidence which…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. CarlsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. FahlkNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API