Legal Opinion

In re Tramner

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1912No. 2010PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Original proceeding for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. Because petitioner is serving a sentence under a judgment of court he cannot be tried for any other offense pending his imprisonment under the judgment. {Ex Parte Meyers, 44 Mo. 280; State v. Buck, 120 Mo. 479, 25 S. W. 573; Ex Parte Allen, 196 Mo. 231, 95 S. W. 415; State v. Bell, 212 Mo. 130, 111 S. W. 29.) The proper place of confinement of the petitioner is in the state…

Read the full summary

Original proceeding for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. Because petitioner is serving a sentence under a judgment of court he cannot be tried for any other offense pending his imprisonment under the judgment. {Ex Parte Meyers, 44 Mo. 280; State v. Buck, 120 Mo. 479, 25 S. W. 573; Ex Parte Allen, 196 Mo. 231, 95 S. W. 415; State v. Bell, 212 Mo. 130, 111 S. W. 29.) The proper place of confinement of the petitioner is in the state penitentiary of the State of Nevada; and the superior right to his custody is in the warden of such penitentiary. {Re Collins,…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Sweeney, C. J.:

The petitioner, together with one Nimrod Urie, was indicted by the grand jury of Humboldt County, Nevada, for the commission of a double murder, committed at Imlay, in said county, wherein Eugene Quilici and Marie Quilici were robbed and murdered. The defendant, Urie, upon motion was granted a separate trial, and upon such trial, held at Winnemucca, -Humboldt County, Nevada, was tried and found guilty of murder in the first degree, and sentenced by the court to be hanged by the neck until he be dead. An appeal from this judgment is pending and undetermined at the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. People v. MajorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Thomas v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. State v. KeefeWyoming Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  5. Ex parte Ah MenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Frankel v. WoodroughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  2. Pines v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  3. Alyea v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. State v. PiersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  5. Hernandez v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API