Legal Opinion
Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Dentek, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 2, 2003No. 3:01 CV 1212(JBA)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruling on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment [Docs. ## 42 & 56]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (“Ohio Casualty”) 1 filed this declaratory judgment action against Dentek, Inc. (“Dentek”), Kamilla Siekierski, Middlesex Mutual Assurance Company (“Middlesex”), General Motors Acceptance Corporation (“GMAC”) and Marie Gentile (both individually and as administrator of the estate of John Gentile). Ohio Casualty seeks a declaration that its policy (“the Ohio Casualty policy”) provides no coverage for the April 15, 2000 automobile accident involving Siekierski and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Heublein, Inc. And Subsidiaries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Rose Schwabenbauer v. Board Of Education Of The City School District Of The City Of OleanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Downs v. National Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Streitweiser v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Hansen v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Middlesex Insurance v. MaraDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Tucker v. American International Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Vermont Mutual Insurance v. CicconeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
- Acadia Insurance v. American Crushing & Recycling, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007