In re American Range & Foundry Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN B. SANBORN, District Judge.
The claimant in its proof of claim states:
That in June, 1921, the bankrupt was engaged in the manufacturing business at Shakopee, Minn. -That the claimant for eight years has been an investment banker. That shortly prior to June 20, 1921, the bankrupt represented that it was sound, was earning large profits, had been operating for thirty years, and that its management was careful, conservative, and economical; that it desired to enlarge its business and to employ claimant as its fiscal agent in selling its “special stock” to obtain funds for that purpose.
That,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- King v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Browning v. HinkleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Guirney v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Little v. ReesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cuneo Press v. Claybourn CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Potlatch Oil & Refining Co. v. Ohio Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- United States ex rel. Gillioz v. John Kerns Const. Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1943