Legal Opinion
Boyd v. University of Maryland Medical System
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 2, 1997No. Civil Action No. WMN-96-3105PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GRIMM, United States Magistrate Judge.
By Order dated April 15, 1997, the Honorable William M. Nickerson referred to the undersigned all discovery disputes in connection with the above-captioned case. Presently pending before me is the University of Maryland Medical System’s (“UMMS”) motion to compel deposition testimony and request for sanctions. Paper No. 38. For the reasons stated below, I will grant the motion. I will also order counsel for the plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed against him for instructing his client not to answer the questions which are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hall v. Clifton PrecisionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Ralston Purina Company v. William A. McFarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Shapiro v. FreemanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Lloyd v. Cessna Aircraft Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1977
- International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. v. Twin Laboratories Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1998
- In re Stratosphere Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1998
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. FreemanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Wolters Kluwer Financial Services Inc. v. ScivantageDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Liscio v. PinsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.