Legal Opinion
Hiller v. Bd. of Educ. of Brunswick Cent. Sch. D.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided August 2, 1990No. 87-CV-1141PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
McCURN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff David Hiller (“David”), by his parents Robert Hiller (“Mr. Hiller”) and Nancy Hiller (“Mrs. Hiller”), brings this action pursuant to the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (“EAHCA” or “Act”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq., alleging that plaintiff is a handicapped child who was denied a free, appropriate education while a student at the defendant Brunswick Central School District (“Brunswick” or “Brittonkill”). Plaintiff seeks a declaration from this court stating that he is a handicapped child within the meaning of the Act; as well…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alexander Kerkam v. Floretta McKenzie Superintendent, D.C. Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Gregory K., a Student of the Longview School District v. Longview School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bartlett v. New York State Board of Law ExaminersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Wall v. Mattituck-Cutchogue School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Evans v. Board of Education of the Rhinebeck Central School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Mavis v. SobolDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1994
- Kroot Ex Rel. Kroot v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.