Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1972No. Appeal, No. 1684PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Packel, J.,

Defendant, a Delaware corporation, admittedly doing business in Pennsylvania, appeals from the order of the court below discharging its rule to open a default judgment. It claims that valid service was never made in compliance with Pa. R. C. P. 2180(a) (2) upon it or any of its agents.

The complaint, filed on August 27, 1968, alleged that on December 28, 1966, the plaintiff slipped on the icy sidewalk of a service station located at 5th and Erie Avenue in Philadelphia. Service was made upon another station located at 6th and Lehigh Avenue. A default judgment was entered…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Myers v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Jeannette v. RoehmeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  4. Atlas Aluminum Corp. v. Methods Research Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Wilson v. Northern InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Liquid Carbonic Corp. v. Cooper & Reese, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schwarz v. SchwarzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Matyas v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Kophazy v. KophazySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Taylor v. Humble Oil and Refining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API