Legal Opinion

Atlas Aluminum Corp. v. Methods Research Products Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1966No. Appeal, No. 123PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

- This is an appeal from the order of the lower court opening judgment and allowing defendant to enter the defense of statute of limitations.

On April 7, 1965, plaintiff filed its.complaint in assumpsit alleging breach of warranty by defendant. On May 12, .1965 the complaint was reinstated, and on. *409June'1.1, 1965, a-,copy, .endorsed.-,with' notice- to .plead. Avithin twenty days, w.as- served upon defendant. .

On July 2, ;1965, -the. twenty-first day after service, at. 9 :04 a.m,,. plaintiff ..filed' praecipe. for default. judgment for failure to file an answer, and .judgment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ehnes v. WagnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Wenger v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Taylor v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Wolfskill v. EganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. North Star Coal Co. v. TeodoriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API