Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Northern Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1967No. Appeal, No. 56PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

We are here concerned with an appeal by Northern Insurance Company from an order of the Court of Com*157mon Pleas of Dauphin County discharging a rule to show cause why a judgment entered by default in an assumpsit action should not be opened. The action was instituted by Donald D. Wilson and Jean M. Wilson, his wife, to recover the cost of repairs to their dwelling allegedly necessitated by collapse of the building, one of the perils insured against under a policy issued by the appellant. The procedural situation appears in the following excerpt from the opinion1 of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Monaco v. Montgomery Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Carrier v. William Penn Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Yentzer v. Taylor Wine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. C. E. Williams Co. v. Henry B. Pancoast Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Namie v. DiGIROLAMOSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schwarz v. SchwarzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Fleck v. McHughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Taylor v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Collier Township v. Robinson TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Farrell v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API