Flores v. Danfelser
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONNELLY, J.
{1} Plaintiffs Maria Stella Flores (hereafter Stella Flores) and Dan Flores, her husband, appeal from an order dismissing their tort claims and claims alleging a violation of their civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) filed against Defendants. Plaintiffs have asserted nine claims on appeal which we consolidate and discuss as follows: (1) whether Plaintiffs’ tort claims are barred under the exclusivity provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act; and (2) whether Plaintiffs alleged viable claims against Defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons discussed…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Delgado v. Phelps Dodge Chino, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- Kennedy v. Dexter Consolidated SchoolsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Jaramillo v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Archuleta v. LaCuestaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Richey v. Hammond Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.