Legal Opinion

Flores v. Danfelser

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1999No. 19,157PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONNELLY, J.

{1} Plaintiffs Maria Stella Flores (hereafter Stella Flores) and Dan Flores, her husband, appeal from an order dismissing their tort claims and claims alleging a violation of their civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) filed against Defendants. Plaintiffs have asserted nine claims on appeal which we consolidate and discuss as follows: (1) whether Plaintiffs’ tort claims are barred under the exclusivity provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act; and (2) whether Plaintiffs alleged viable claims against Defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons discussed…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Delgado v. Phelps Dodge Chino, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Kennedy v. Dexter Consolidated SchoolsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Jaramillo v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Archuleta v. LaCuestaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Richey v. Hammond Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API