Legal Opinion
Yahnel v. Bd. of Adjust. of Jamesburg
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 20, 1963PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
79 N.J. Super. 509 (1963)
192 A.2d 177
ETHEL YAHNEL, JACK AND IRMA SAUERMAN AND RUDOLPH AND MARY ANN WOLFINGER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF JAMESBURG, N.J., MAYOR AND BOROUGH COUNCIL OF JAMESBURG, N.J., FRANK PERGOLA, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF JAMESBURG, NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, AND MICHAEL AND ROSE SEMINARA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 29, 1963.
Decided June 20, 1963.
Before Judges CONFORD, GAULKIN and KILKENNY.
Mr. Frederick F. Richardson argued the cause for appellants.
Mr. William C.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Grundlehner v. DanglerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Dolan v. DeCapuaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Andrews v. Ocean Twp. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Medici v. BPR Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- TAXPAYERS ASSN. OF WEYMOUTH TP. INC. v. Weymouth Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Burbridge v. Governing BodySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Sica v. Board of Adjustment of Tp. of WallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- DeSimone v. Greater Englewood Housing Corp. No. 1Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.