Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Barthet v. Judge Division B, Civil District Court Parish

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 15, 1888No. 10,153PublishedCited by 11 opinions

^PPLICATION for Certiorari. Villavaso vs. Walker. 24 Ann. 213; Matter of Vanderbilt, 4 Johnson's Chancery, 1Í. p. 57; State vs. Harvey, 14 Wisconsin, 151; Case of Lafon’s Hen., 3U. S., 713; Arts. 1011 and 1012, C. P.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Bermudez, C. J.

This, is au application for a certiorari. The complaint of the relator is that the district judge has arbitrarily sentenced *435him for contempt for having violated an injunction which at the time of its alleged infraction had ceased to have any existence.

In his return, the district judge sets forth reasons for his justification.

The prayer is that the validity of the proceedings attacked be considered, and that the sentence be annulled to all purposes.

It appears that the district court, in 1885, issued an injunction to prevent the defendant…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Gretna v. RossnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  2. Blaise v. Security Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  3. State v. BroxsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  4. Perrault v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  5. State ex rel. Milling v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API