Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Milling v. Louisiana Public Service Commission
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided November 12, 1923No. 26241PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
By the WHOLE COURT.
O’NIELL, C. J.
This is a proceeding by certiorari and prohibition to prevent the Public Service Commission from compelling the relator to go from his home and business in Shreveport to the Commission’s place of meeting in New Orleans, to show cause why he should not be punished by the Commission for contempt of its authority.
Relator is the attorney for the Standard Pipe Line Company, Inc., under the jurisdiction of the Public Service Commission. On the 8th of August, 1923, he addressed a letter to the secretary of the Commission, in which he sent a proposed tariff, or set of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- State ex rel. DeBuys v. Judges of Civil District CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
- State ex rel. HeroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
- State ex rel. Stewart v. ReidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- State ex rel. Barthet v. Judge Division B, Civil District Court ParishSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McHugh v. Placid Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
- Joint Legislative Committee of the Legislature v. StrainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
- Morrison Cafeteria of Louisiana, Inc. v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- Crowell & Spencer Lumber Co. v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Pearce v. DozierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.