Legal Opinion
State v. Broxson
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 31, 1927No. 28364PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOverton, J.
The assistant district attorney for the Fourteenth judicial district filed a rule in behalf of the state against relator to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt of court. The charge against relator is fully disclosed by the first article of the rule, which reads as follows:
“That the said Jim Broxson did, during the week of November 29, 1926, while in attendance at court in the case of State v. Jim Ross, No. 2604 of the criminal docket of this court, and while one AV. W. Forshee was -in attendance at court as a petit juror in said case, approach the said AV. W. Forshee and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Phelps v. Judge of the Civil District CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
- Blaise v. Security Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- State ex rel. Barthet v. Judge Division B, Civil District Court ParishSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1888
- State ex rel. Kiernan v. MonroeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
- State ex rel. Alverson v. SommervilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Feuerstein v. KalbWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Hattier v. MartinezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Perrault v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- State v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- Gautreaux v. GautreauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.