Legal Opinion
Warren v. Waterville Urban Renewal Authority
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 3, 1969PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFRESNE, Justice.
The plaintiff’s complaint seeks from the defendant, Waterville Urban Renewal Authority (Authority), damages for its alleged tortious interference with tenancy contracts existing between the plaintiff and her tenants prior to the Authority’s taking in eminent domain proceedings of plaintiff’s land and buildings devoted to the business of renting apartments.
Certain aspects of the Authority’s condemnation of plaintiff’s property were reviewed by this Court in the cases of Warren v. Waterville Urban Renewal Authority, 1965, 161 Me. 160, 210 A.2d 41 and Warren v. Waterville Urban…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Quillie B. Woodham v. The American Cystoscope Company of Pelham, N. Y., and the Xyz CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Hazzard v. Westview Golf Club, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- Warren v. Waterville Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- Jusino v. Morales & TioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- Belanger v. BelangerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harmon v. HarmonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Warren v. Waterville Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- In re C.P.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Blance v. AlleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Harris Baking Company v. MazzeoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.