Legal Opinion
Jusino v. Morales & Tio
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 18, 1944No. 3942PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGRUDER, Circuit Judge.
Appellants brought their complaint in the court below against their employer for recovery of unpaid minimum wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. The defendant, appellee herein, filed a motion to dismiss the action because the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. On February 23, 1943, the motion to dismiss was granted and judgment was entered dismissing the complaint. On March 24, 1943, the plaintiffs filed in the court below a motion, with accompanying brief, praying the court to reconsider and vacate the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Pfister v. Northern Illinois Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Denholm & McKay Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942
- Riglesberger v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Martinez v. TrainorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Quillie B. Woodham v. The American Cystoscope Company of Pelham, N. Y., and the Xyz CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Martinez v. TrainorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Burton R. Raughley v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Robert W. Flint, Jr. v. Francis Howard, Warden, Adult Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.