Legal Opinion
McInnis v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided July 16, 1992No. 3-87-0062PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HIGGINS, District Judge.
The Court has before it the motions to dismiss of the defendants, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith; Sandestin Beach Hotel, Inc.; and Frank L. Flautt, Jr., made orally on October 30, 1991, after the close of the plaintiffs’ proof. Merrill Lynch filed a contemporaneous written motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 446).1 Also before the Court are the plantiffs’ response to motion to dismiss of defendant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (filed October 29, 1991; Docket Entry No. 448), and Merrill Lynch’s reply brief in support of motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Robertson v. Seattle Audubon SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Blane v. American Inventors Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1996
- Nichols v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1992