Legal Opinion
Shepard v. McDonald
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 9, 1934No. 4-3181PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This proceeding is a continuation of the case of Shepard v. McDonald, 188 Ark. 124, wherein we said: "It has been specifically agreed between counsel for petitioner and respondent that the question of the sufficiency of the ballot title in the instant case be reserved for decision until the jurisdictional questions have been determined. Therefore we do not here decide or discuss the sufficiency of the ballot title, etc."
The question thus expressly reserved for future determinations here presented, and we now proceed to its determination.
The ballot title submitted with the referendum petitions…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Westbrook v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Shepard v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
3Cited by11 opinions
- Walton v. McDonald, SEC. of StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Newton v. Hall, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Hope v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- McDonald v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Bill Paschall, Individually and on Behalf of Arkansans for Patient Access, a Ballot Question Committee v. John Thurston, in His Capacity as Arkansas Secretary of State, and Jim Bell, Individually and on Behalf of Protect Arkansas Kids, a Ballot Question Committee, IntervenorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.