Legal Opinion

Bill Paschall, Individually and on Behalf of Arkansans for Patient Access, a Ballot Question Committee v. John Thurston, in His Capacity as Arkansas Secretary of State, and Jim Bell, Individually and on Behalf of Protect Arkansas Kids, a Ballot Question Committee, Intervenor

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 21, 2024Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

2024 Ark. 155

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-24-652 Opinion Delivered: October 21, 2024 BILL PASCHALL, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ARKANSANS AN ORIGINAL ACTION FOR PATIENT ACCESS, A BALLOT QUESTION COMMITTEE PETITIONERS V. JOHN THURSTON, IN HIS CAPACITY AS ARKANSAS SECRETARY OF STATE RESPONDENT PETITIONERS’ PETITION DENIED; JIM BELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON RESPONDENT’S REQUEST FOR BEHALF OF PROTECT ARKANSAS RELIEF DENIED; INTERVENORS’ KIDS, A BALLOT QUESTION REQUEST FOR RELIEF GRANTED. COMMITTEE INTERVENORS SHAWN A. WOMACK, Associate Justice Petitioners Bill Paschall and Arkansans for…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Pafford v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Arkansas Women's Political Caucus v. RiviereSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Hoban v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  4. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
  5. Leigh v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API