Legal Opinion
Newton v. Hall, Secretary of State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 19, 1938No. 4-5352PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The only question presented for our consideration and decision in this case is the sufficiency of the ballot title under which it is proposed to submit Amendment No. 28 to the electors for their action at the coming general election. This amendment is generally referred to as the Refunding Amendment.
To present the objections made to the sufficiency of the ballot title it will be necessary to copy the amendment in this opinion, notwithstanding its length, and in doing so we shall, after copying each section of the amendment, also copy the portion of the ballot title relating to that section.
Sec…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Walton v. McDonald, SEC. of StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Westbrook v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Coleman v. SherrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Mayor of Baltimore v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Leigh v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- Christian Civic Action Committee v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Dust v. RiviereSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Sturdy v. Hall, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
- Fletcher v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.