Legal Opinion

Lawton v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1930No. Appeal, 187PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiffs’ appeal from a judgment of the court below refusing to take off a nonsuit in an action brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by Mrs. Lawton, in a fall while alighting from one of defendant’s cars. The claim was based on the theory that a defect existed in the step causing it to drop a few inches as plaintiff placed her foot on it, thus causing her to lose her balance and fall. In entering a nonsuit the court below held there was no evidence that the step, a folding one that raised and lowered with the closing and opening of the door, dropped further…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Director GeneralSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Murray v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. LenzSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  2. Greeley v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API