Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. DB Investments, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 13, 2010No. Nos. 08-2784, 08-2785, 08-2798, 08-2799, 08-2818, 08-2819, 08-2831, 08-2881PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JORDAN, Circuit Judge.
For more than one hundred years, De Beers S.A. and other entities within the De Beers family of companies (hereinafter collectively “De Beers”) have fixed prices in the wholesale market for gem-quality diamonds through a web of pricing and output-purchase agreements with competitors. In the late 1990s, however, De Beers’s market power began to wane as new suppliers entered the market and competitors refused to cooperate with De Beers’s pricing efforts. Amidst these structural changes to the market, plaintiffs brought the present claims under §§ 1 and…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sullivan v. DB Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- In re Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- Thorogood v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Dewey v. Volkswagen of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- In re M3 Power Razor System Marketing & Sales Practice LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.