Legal Opinion

Soto v. Sky Union, LLC

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 29, 2016No. Case No. 15 C 4768PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge

Jose Soto, Christine Exelby, and Tanner Eastman have sued Sky Union, LLC, on behalf of themselves and putative classes of similarly situated persons. Plaintiffs allege that they lost money playing the online game Castle Clash, which Sky Union operates. They contend that Castle Clash is a game of chance — gambling—that Sky Union camouflaged as a game of skill.

Plaintiffs claim that Sky Union violated the laws of Illinois, Michigan, and California — the states in which Soto, Exelby, and Eastman reside, respectively. Specifically,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. HPI Health Care Services, Inc. v. Mt. Vernon Hospital, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Ann Bogie v. Joan AlexandraSangerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Cleary v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cheryl Kater v. Churchill Downs Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Phillips v. Double Down Interactive LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  3. Coffee v. Google LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  4. Yaniv De Ridder, et al. v. Roblox Corporation, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API