State v. Gordon
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Davis, J.:
These consolidated cases come before us on petition for review. The Court of Appeals, interpreting provisions of K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-4611 and K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 22-3716, concluded that the district court lacked jurisdiction to extend the defendants’ probations and further concluded that the extension of Scribner’s probation without a hearing was contrary to law. State v. Gordon, 30 Kan. App. 2d 852, 50 P.3d 100 (2002). We conclude that the district court retained jurisdiction under K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-4611 and K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 22-3716 to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Stovall v. MeneleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Babe Houser Motor Co. v. TetreaultSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- State v. EnglesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Ronald Skipworth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. SkolautSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Pieren-Abbott v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- State v. RupnickSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- State v. ManbeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
- State v. HambrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.