Legal Opinion

State v. Gordon

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 18, 2003No. 86,624 and 86,625PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.:

These consolidated cases come before us on petition for review. The Court of Appeals, interpreting provisions of K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-4611 and K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 22-3716, concluded that the district court lacked jurisdiction to extend the defendants’ probations and further concluded that the extension of Scribner’s probation without a hearing was contrary to law. State v. Gordon, 30 Kan. App. 2d 852, 50 P.3d 100 (2002). We conclude that the district court retained jurisdiction under K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-4611 and K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 22-3716 to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State Ex Rel. Stovall v. MeneleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. Babe Houser Motor Co. v. TetreaultSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. State v. EnglesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  5. Ronald Skipworth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. SkolautSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Pieren-Abbott v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. State v. RupnickSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  4. State v. ManbeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. State v. HambrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API