Mills v. Coil
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STATON, Judge.
Susan and Rachel Mills (collectively "Mills") appeal the trial court's order setting aside a default judgment entered in their favor. Mills raises one issue on appeal which we restate as follows: whether the trial court erred in setting aside the default judgment.
We affirm.
The facts most favorable to the judgment are as follows. Mills and Steven Coil ("Coil") were involved in a two-car accident. At the time of the accident, Coil resided in Fort Wayne. After settlement negotiations, Mills filed suit against Coil, serving the complaint by certified mail at Coil's Fort Wayne…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- LaPalme v. RomeroIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Grecco v. CampbellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Santiago v. KilmerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. Omega Painting, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Poteet v. BethkeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lisa Homer v. Nathaniel Jones-BeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Munster v. GroceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Mary L. Anderson v. Wayne Post 64, American Legion Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Hill v. RameyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Norris v. Personal FinanceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.