Legal Opinion

State v. McDonald

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 2005No. WD 65123PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Presiding Judge.

The State of Missouri appeals a trial court decision sustaining David McDonald’s motion to suppress evidence. The State argues that a campus police officer was justified under the fresh pur suit doctrine in pursuing and arresting McDonald outside of the officer’s territorial jurisdiction. Finding no abuse of discretion by the motion court, we affirm.

Facts

In the early morning hours of November 13, 2004, David L. McDonald, Jr., was driving through the campus of Northwest Missouri State University (hereinafter Northwest) in Maryville, Missouri, traveling at a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MilliornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  2. State v. PfleidererMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. State v. CostaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State v. MullenixMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. State v. KampschroederMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State of Missouri v. Kathryn AventMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State v. WestMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. State of Missouri v. Peter O. BaldwinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. KruseMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State v. BatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API