State v. Kampschroeder
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RHODES RUSSELL, Judge.
State interlocutorily appeals the trial court’s order sustaining defendant’s motion to suppress evidence in a criminal drug proceeding. We find that the search of defendant was incident to a lawful arrest and the subsequent search of the house was conducted pursuant to consent. However, no valid consent was given to search the automobile. We reverse and remand in part and affirm in part.
The evidence viewed in a light most favorable to the ruling is as follows. On the evening of February 19, 1997, Washington city police officers were dispatched to a residence to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. MercerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- State v. OwsleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- State v. WinstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Poage v. Director of Revenue, State of Mo.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. PfleidererMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. AbelnMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. LewisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- State of Missouri v. Kathryn AventMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.