Legal Opinion
State v. Kruse
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 19, 2010No. WD 70481PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. SMART, JR., Judge.
The State of Missouri appeals the grant of a motion to suppress physical evidence in a criminal case against Conrad Kruse. The State argues on appeal that the evidence should not have been suppressed. The judgment is affirmed.
Facts
Conrad Kruse was charged with two counts of possession of a controlled substance, section 195.202, one count of first-degree trafficking, section 195.222, one count of unlawful use of drug paraphernalia, section 195.233, and one count of possession of a methamphetamine, section 195.233, and one count of possession of a methamphetamine…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant/appellee v. Thomas Jeffrey Raines, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- State v. KrileyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. CromerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. BerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- State of Missouri v. Leland Dwayne DaggettMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. HartrupMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Missouri v. KruseSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- State of Missouri v. Prinshun McClainMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.