Samuels v. Larrimore
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court- of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. E. P. Mogan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.
two appeals are in separate records, but they will be considered together, as one is an appeal by defendant from the judgment against him, and the other from the order denying his motion for a new trial, and the questions are all considered together in the briefs filed by counsel.
The complaint is as follows: “That within two years last past said defendant became indebted to one Frank A. Whitman, in the sum of $635.86 for so much money loaned and advanced to said defendant by said Whitman at various times during said period at the special instance and request of said defendant. That prior to…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Ricker v. Ricker, AdministratrixOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Sherman v. IngelmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Evankovich v. Howard Pierce, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1932
- Hudson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- Hudson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938