Legal Opinion

Evankovich v. Howard Pierce, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1932No. 6,872PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

Howard Pierce, Inc., defendant, has appealed from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Marco Evankovich, in a suit brought for the dual purpose of having a contract for the purchase of a “used car” reformed, and for damages for the alleged breach of the contract.

The testimony on behalf of the plaintiff, believed by the court and jury, is to the following effect: Evankovich, who can neither read nor write the English language and understands it but imperfectly, owned a Chevrolet touring car which was too small for the accommodation of his large family, and, on April 5, 1927, agreed with a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Parchen v. ChessmanMontana Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Works v. HersheySupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  3. Humble v. St. JohnMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Bennett v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
  5. Lehrkind v. McDonnellMontana Supreme Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Voyta v. ClontsMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Wyatt v. School District No. 104, Fergus CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Bennett v. DodgsonMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Griffith v. Cedar Creek Oil & Gas Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Schwartz v. Inspiration Gold Mining Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API