Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hudson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 12, 1938No. 7495Published

1DissentHamilton, Circuit Judge

I am unable to concur in the opinion of the Court.

On March 1, 1929, the directors of the corporation, at the suggestion of the company’s accountant, in order to avoid an overstatement of the company’s balance sheet assets, adopted a resolution providing for the charging of all the debit balances of the Hudson stockholders to surplus, the material part of which is as follows: “Be it resolved that the overdrafts shown on the accounts of Charles Hudson, Galvin Hudson, Administrator, Mrs. Charles Hudson and Miss Marie Hudson be cleared out of the assets of the Hudson and Dugger Company by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Doyle v. Mitchell Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Helvering v. Midland Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Lincoln Nat. Bank v. BurnetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
  4. Chattanooga Sav. Bank v. BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
  5. Eaton v. English & Mersick Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API