Legal Opinion

McMillan v. Miller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1913No. Docket No. 99PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Hally, J. Bill by Enos L. McMillan and Neil McMillan, Jr., against Theodore Miller and others. From an order sustaining defendants’ demurrer to the bill of. complaint, complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

The complainants and the defendants *512were all stockholders in a corporation known as the Miller Car Company. The bill of complaint was filed, as stated in complainants’ brief, to obtain an accounting from the defendants. The material allegations in the bill of complaint are that the defendants promoted the corporation; that two of the defendants were elected president and secretary and devoted but little time to the business; that the board of directors voted two of the defendants salaries of $100 per month; that the defendants sold their stock interest in the corporation; that complainants…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miner v. Belle Isle Ice Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hale v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Cicotte v. Theophile AnciauxMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Coxe v. HartMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Fuller v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dean v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Futernick v. Statler Builders, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Lucking v. Welbilt Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API