Futernick v. Statler Builders, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
While there are other theories referred to in the pleadings and briefs, basically this is a stockholders’ derivative suit on behalf of 1 corporation against another. The stockholders’ claim is that the latter corporation is fraudulently •withholding funds properly due and owing to the former corporation.
This suit was brought by plaintiff Futernick on behalf of Concord Builders, Inc. The record discloses that Futernick was owner of 1/3 of the stock of Concord Builders, Inc., and that the individual defendants herein, Faggen and Tutnick, were owners of the other 2/3. Plaintiff claims the other…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Miner v. Belle Isle Ice Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. City of ParkersburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Talbot v. ScrippsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Madugula v. TaubMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- Genzer v. CunninghamDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1980
- Averill v. DAUTERMANMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Huron City Company v. Charles Abram Parcells IIIMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Huron City Company v. Charles Abram Parcells IIIMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018