Legal Opinion

In Re Philbrook

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 1920No. Crim. No. 906PublishedCited by 7 opinions

PROCEEDING on Habeas Corpus to secure the release of an administrator adjudged guilty of contempt of court in refusing to render a final account. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

A writ of habeas corpus was granted by Mr. Justice Lawlor of the supreme court returnable to this court, the petitioner claiming that he was restrained of his liberty under an order of the superior court in Alameda County adjudging him guilty of contempt upon his refusal to account as the administrator of the estate of his deceased wife, Florence E. Philbrook, who had formerly been the administratrix with the will annexed of the estate of Humphrey A. Randall, ancillary administration of whose estate is pending in the superior court, the main estate having been administered or being in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex parte Ah MenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Ex parte GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Matter of Application of La DueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. In re Estate of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Ex parte PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ClaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. In Re Estate of RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. In Re NorthcottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Smith v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Turney v. ShattuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API