Legal Opinion
Turney v. Shattuck
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 1, 1929No. Docket No. 5690PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, J., pro tem.
The defendant in this case was named in the will of Nicholas John Steiner as executrix, without bond, and shortly after the death of Steiner she was duly appointed to that office and qualified on June 20, 1917. On February 25, 1924, citation issued commanding the executrix to appear May 9, 1924, and show cause why she should not be removed. Her powers were suspended in the order for the citation. On June 2, 1924, she was removed by order of the superior court sitting in probate. On August 1, 1924, Rev. Harold Turney was appointed administrator with the will annexed. He…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Burris v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Bauer v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Philbrook v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Cook v. CeasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Clary v. ClaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Willson v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Hill v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Wiersma v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Best v. ColoneusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Hochwender v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.