Legal Opinion

Smith v. O/P Transportation

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1996No. 21373PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Industrial Commission finding that Idaho’s cancellation requirement of sixty days notice was not applicable to a former worker’s compensation surety of Billy Joe Smith’s (Smith) statutory employer. The Commission determined that the policy was not “issued against liability arising under” the Idaho worker’s compensation law, but rather was issued against liability arising under Oregon’s worker’s compensation law. As a result, the Commission found that the surety had no liability to Smith because, according to Oregon law, it effectively…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davaz v. Priest River Glass Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Gifford v. NottinghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Langley v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Erikson v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Adam v. Titan Equipment Supply Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cascade Auto Glass, Inc. v. IDAHO FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Dinius v. Loving Care and More, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Boley v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Gage v. Express PersonnelIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Whitaker Construction Co., Inc. v. The Cincinnati Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API